Search for: "Appellate Court Albany N.Y." Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2009, 3:04 pm
In this newest case, the trial judge, Albany County Supreme Court Justice Thomas J. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 10:38 am
"N.Y. appeals court backs married lesbian couple's parental rights": Claire Hughes has this front page article in The Times Union of Albany, New York. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 3:30 am
Similarly, in State of New York v Gordon, 102 A.D.2d 990, affirmed, 64 N.Y.2d 712, the court ruled that the employer could recover the cost of the benefits it provided to an individual placed on leave for training purposes in the event he or she fails to return to his or her job. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 10:24 am
Reuters has a report headlined "Chimps have no human rights: N.Y. court. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Finally, under the circumstances of this case, the Appellate Division concluded that the penalty of dismissal from SUNY Albany imposed on Petitioner was not disproportionate to the offense, citing Lampert v State Univ. of N.Y. at Albany, 116 AD3d 1292, leave to appeal denied, 23 NY3d 908. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 12:58 pm by ALeonard
In a curiously narrow decision that may nonetheless have profound significance, a unanimous five-judge panel of the New York Appellate Division, 3rd Department, based in Albany, ruled on March 18 that there is no public policy reason to bar the application of the doctrine of comity in determining whether a New York trial court has jurisdiction to consider a petition to dissolve a Vermont civil union. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Failure to effect proper service of all of the necessary documents as mandated by law is fatal to a court attaining jurisdiction over the state parties in the actionRandolph v Office of The N.Y. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Failure to effect proper service of all of the necessary documents as mandated by law is fatal to a court attaining jurisdiction over the state parties in the actionRandolph v Office of The N.Y. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 11:00 pm
”Given those discrepancies, the appellate court concluded that Corrections lacked a bonafide basis to withhold the requested footage and remitted the matter to the Albany County Supreme Court for a determination as to the fees and costs awardable to PLS, given its prevailing party status here.Looks like that FOIL foolishness got flogged.# # #Matter of Prisoners' Legal Servs. of N.Y. v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Inasmuch as that burden-shifting standard is not a rational construction of §5.08, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Albany County Sheriffs Local 775 of N.Y. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Inasmuch as that burden-shifting standard is not a rational construction of §5.08, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Albany County Sheriffs Local 775 of N.Y. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Last Thursday, New York's intermediate appellate court in People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: Illinois Appellate Court Affirms Trial Court’s Decision on Claim of Ownership of Four Works of Art Illinois Appellate Court Vacates and Remands Case Dismissed; Contest Over Mutual Last Will and Testament Illinois Appellate Court Finds No Evidence of Bad Faith in Estate Dispute       [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:36 am
" Further, the Appellate Division stated that "[W]here an agreement is 'reasonably susceptible of the construction given it by the arbitrator, a court may not vacate the award," citing Matter of Albany County Sheriffs Local 775 of N.Y. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
Servicemen & Allied Workers, Local Union No. 669 of Albany, N.Y and Vic.), 2013 NY Slip Op 05031, Appellate Division, Third Department The genesis of this appeal was the arbitrator’s rejection of Adirondack Beverages’ contention that the grievances at issue were not timely filed under the collective bargaining agreement [CBA]. [read post]